TY - JOUR
T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging of in vitro urine flow in single and tandem stented ureters subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction
AU - Dror, Ishai
AU - Harris, Talia
AU - Kalchenko, Vyacheslav
AU - Shilo, Yaniv
AU - Berkowitz, Brian
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Objective, To quantify the relative volumetric flows in stent and ureter lumina, as a function of stent size and configuration, in both unobstructed and externally obstructed stented ureters. Methods, Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure flow in stented ureters using a phantom kidney model. Volumetric flow in the stent and ureter lumina were determined along the stented ureters, for each of four single stent sizes (4.8F, 6F, 7F, and 8F), and for tandem (6F and 7F) configurations. Measurements were made in the presence of a fully encircling extrinsic ureteral obstruction as well as in benchmark cases with no extrinsic ureteral obstruction. Results, Under no obstruction, the relative contribution of urine flow in single stents is 1–10%, while the relative contributions to flow are ~6 and ~28% for tandem 6F and 7F, respectively. In the presence of an extrinsic ureteral obstruction and single stents, all urine passes within the stent lumen near the extrinsic ureteral obstruction. For tandem 6F and 7F stents under extrinsic ureteral obstruction, relative volumetric flows in the two stent lumina are ~73% and ~81%, respectively, with the remainder passing through the ureter lumen. Conclusions, Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates that with no extrinsic ureteral obstruction, minimal urine flow occurs within a stent. Stent lumen flow is significant in the presence of extrinsic ureteral obstruction, in the vicinity of the extrinsic ureteral obstruction. For tandem stents subjected to extrinsic ureteral obstruction, urine flow also occurs in the ureter lumen between the stents, which can reduce the likelihood of kidney failure even in the case of both stent lumina being occluded.
AB - Objective, To quantify the relative volumetric flows in stent and ureter lumina, as a function of stent size and configuration, in both unobstructed and externally obstructed stented ureters. Methods, Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure flow in stented ureters using a phantom kidney model. Volumetric flow in the stent and ureter lumina were determined along the stented ureters, for each of four single stent sizes (4.8F, 6F, 7F, and 8F), and for tandem (6F and 7F) configurations. Measurements were made in the presence of a fully encircling extrinsic ureteral obstruction as well as in benchmark cases with no extrinsic ureteral obstruction. Results, Under no obstruction, the relative contribution of urine flow in single stents is 1–10%, while the relative contributions to flow are ~6 and ~28% for tandem 6F and 7F, respectively. In the presence of an extrinsic ureteral obstruction and single stents, all urine passes within the stent lumen near the extrinsic ureteral obstruction. For tandem 6F and 7F stents under extrinsic ureteral obstruction, relative volumetric flows in the two stent lumina are ~73% and ~81%, respectively, with the remainder passing through the ureter lumen. Conclusions, Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates that with no extrinsic ureteral obstruction, minimal urine flow occurs within a stent. Stent lumen flow is significant in the presence of extrinsic ureteral obstruction, in the vicinity of the extrinsic ureteral obstruction. For tandem stents subjected to extrinsic ureteral obstruction, urine flow also occurs in the ureter lumen between the stents, which can reduce the likelihood of kidney failure even in the case of both stent lumina being occluded.
U2 - 10.1111/iju.14942
DO - 10.1111/iju.14942
M3 - Article
C2 - 35649584
SN - 0919-8172
VL - 29
SP - 1221
EP - 1226
JO - International Journal of Urology
JF - International Journal of Urology
IS - 10
ER -