TY - JOUR
T1 - Principal component analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced mri in human prostate cancer
AU - Eyal, Erez
AU - Bloch, B. Nicolas
AU - Rofsky, Neil M.
AU - Furman-Haran, Edna
AU - Genega, Elizabeth M.
AU - Lenkinski, Robert E.
AU - Degani, Hadassa
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - Objectives: To develop and evaluate a fast, objective and standardized method for image processing of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the prostate based on principal component analysis (PCA). Materials and Methods:The study was approved by the institutional internal review board; signed informed consent was obtained. MRI of the prostate at 3 Tesla was performed in 21 patients with biopsy proven cancers before radical prostatectomy. Seven 3-dimensional gradient echo datesets, 2 pre and 5 post-gadopentetate dimeglumine injection (0.1 mmol/kg), were acquired within 10.5 minutes at high spatial resolution. PCA of dynamic intensity-scaled (IS) and enhancement-scaled (ES) datasets and analysis by the 3-time points (3TP) method were applied using the latter method for adjusting the PCA eigenvectors. Results: PCA of 7 IS datasets and 6 ES datasets yielded their corresponding eigenvectors and eigenvalues. The first IS-eigenvector captured the major part of the signal variance because of a signal change between the precontrast and the first postcontrast arising from the inhomogeneous surface coil reception profile. The next 2 IS-eigenvectors and the 2 dominant ES-eigenvectors captured signal changes because of tissue contrast-enhancement, whereas the remaining eigenvectors captured noise changes. These eigenvectors were adjusted by rotation to reach congruence with the wash-in and wash-out kinetic parameters defined according to the 3TP method. The IS and ES-eigenvectors and rotation angles were highly reproducible across patients enabling the calculation of a general rotated eigenvector base that served to rapidly and objectively calculate diagnostically relevant projection coefficient maps for new cases. We found for the a priori selected prostate cancer patients that the projection coefficients of the IS-2nd eigenvector provided a higher accuracy for detecting biopsy proven cancers (94% sensitivity, 67% specificity, 80% ppv, and 89% npv) than the projection coefficients of the ES-2nd rotated and non rotated eigenvectors. Conclusions: PCA adjusted to correlate with physiological parameters selects a dominant eigenvector, free of the inhomogeneous radio-frequency field reception-profile and noise-components. Projection coefficient maps of this eigenvector provide a fast, objective, and standardized means for visualizing prostate cancer.
AB - Objectives: To develop and evaluate a fast, objective and standardized method for image processing of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the prostate based on principal component analysis (PCA). Materials and Methods:The study was approved by the institutional internal review board; signed informed consent was obtained. MRI of the prostate at 3 Tesla was performed in 21 patients with biopsy proven cancers before radical prostatectomy. Seven 3-dimensional gradient echo datesets, 2 pre and 5 post-gadopentetate dimeglumine injection (0.1 mmol/kg), were acquired within 10.5 minutes at high spatial resolution. PCA of dynamic intensity-scaled (IS) and enhancement-scaled (ES) datasets and analysis by the 3-time points (3TP) method were applied using the latter method for adjusting the PCA eigenvectors. Results: PCA of 7 IS datasets and 6 ES datasets yielded their corresponding eigenvectors and eigenvalues. The first IS-eigenvector captured the major part of the signal variance because of a signal change between the precontrast and the first postcontrast arising from the inhomogeneous surface coil reception profile. The next 2 IS-eigenvectors and the 2 dominant ES-eigenvectors captured signal changes because of tissue contrast-enhancement, whereas the remaining eigenvectors captured noise changes. These eigenvectors were adjusted by rotation to reach congruence with the wash-in and wash-out kinetic parameters defined according to the 3TP method. The IS and ES-eigenvectors and rotation angles were highly reproducible across patients enabling the calculation of a general rotated eigenvector base that served to rapidly and objectively calculate diagnostically relevant projection coefficient maps for new cases. We found for the a priori selected prostate cancer patients that the projection coefficients of the IS-2nd eigenvector provided a higher accuracy for detecting biopsy proven cancers (94% sensitivity, 67% specificity, 80% ppv, and 89% npv) than the projection coefficients of the ES-2nd rotated and non rotated eigenvectors. Conclusions: PCA adjusted to correlate with physiological parameters selects a dominant eigenvector, free of the inhomogeneous radio-frequency field reception-profile and noise-components. Projection coefficient maps of this eigenvector provide a fast, objective, and standardized means for visualizing prostate cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949847350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181d0a02f
DO - 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181d0a02f
M3 - Article
SN - 0020-9996
VL - 45
SP - 174
EP - 181
JO - Investigative Radiology
JF - Investigative Radiology
IS - 4
ER -