SN 2015bn: A Detailed Multi-wavelength View of a Nearby Superluminous Supernova

M. Nicholl, E. Berger, S. J. Smartt, R. Margutti, A. Kamble, K. D. Alexander, T. -W. Chen, C. Inserra, Iair Arcavi, P. K. Blanchard, R. Cartier, K. C. Chambers, M. J. Childress, R. Chornock, P. S. Cowperthwaite, M. Drout, H. A. Flewelling, M. Fraser, Avishay Gal-Yam, L. GalbanyJ. Harmanen, T. W. -S. Holoien, G. Hosseinzadeh, D. A. Howell, M. E. Huber, A. Jerkstrand, E. Kankare, C. S. Kochanek, Z. -Y. Lin, R. Lunnan, E. A. Magnier, K. Maguire, C. McCully, M. McDonald, B. D. Metzger, D. Milisavljevic, A. Mitra, T. Reynolds, J. Saario, B. J. Shappee, K. W. Smith, S. Valenti, V. A. Villar, C. Waters, D. R. Young

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

134 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present observations of SN 2015bn (=PS15ae = CSS141223-113342+004332 = MLS150211-113342+004333), a Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN) at redshift z = 0.1136. As well as being one of the closest SLSNe I yet discovered, it is intrinsically brighter (MU ≈ -23.1) and in a fainter galaxy (MB ≈ -16.0) than other SLSNe at . We used this opportunity to collect the most extensive data set for any SLSN I to date, including densely sampled spectroscopy and photometry, from the UV to the NIR, spanning -50 to +250 days from optical maximum. SN 2015bn fades slowly, but exhibits surprising undulations in the light curve on a timescale of 30-50 days, especially in the UV. The spectrum shows extraordinarily slow evolution except for a rapid transformation between +7 and +20-30 days. No narrow emission lines from slow-moving material are observed at any phase. We derive physical properties including the bolometric luminosity, and find slow velocity evolution and non-monotonic temperature and radial evolution. A deep radio limit rules out a healthy off-axis gamma-ray burst, and places constraints on the pre-explosion mass loss. The data can be consistently explained by a ≳ 10 M stripped progenitor exploding with erg kinetic energy, forming a magnetar with a spin-down timescale of ∼20 days (thus avoiding a gamma-ray burst) that reheats the ejecta and drives ionization fronts. The most likely alternative scenario - interaction with ∼20 M of dense, inhomogeneous circumstellar material - can be tested with continuing radio follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Article number39
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume826
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jul 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'SN 2015bn: A Detailed Multi-wavelength View of a Nearby Superluminous Supernova'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this